New ham radio operators in Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska
12 people earned their first amateur radio license here in the past 12 months. Updated weekly from FCC data.
At a glance · Data as of
- New hams · last 30 days
- 0
- New hams · last 12 months
- 12
- ▲ up from 8
- Active licensed hams
- 596
- Upgrades · 12 mo
- 7
- Vanity callsigns · 12 mo
- 1
- Address updates · 12 mo
- 2
- Often a move into the area
- Expiring · next 6 mo
- 31
About ham radio in Matanuska-Susitna Borough
Matanuska-Susitna Borough added 12 new amateur radio operators in the past 12 months, compared with 8 the year before. That puts it in the top 10% of Alaska boroughs and census areas for new hams (#3 of 30). Technicians make up 45% of local licensees, close to the Alaska average of 46%. 7 operators upgraded their license in the past year, the moment many buy their first HF rig. 31 licenses expire in the next six months, a chance for clubs to reconnect.
New hams by month
Show data table
| Month | New hams |
|---|---|
| Oct 2025 | 0 |
| Nov 2025 | 4 |
| Dec 2025 | 1 |
| Jan 2026 | 1 |
| Feb 2026 | 0 |
| Mar 2026 | 0 |
| Apr 2026 | 3 |
| May 2026 | 2 |
| Jun 2026 | 0 |
| Jul 2026 | 1 |
| Aug 2026 | 0 |
| Sep 2026 | 0 |
| Total | 12 |
License classes
| Class | Hams | Share | Alaska |
|---|---|---|---|
| Technician | 267 | 45% | 46% |
| General | 174 | 29% | 27% |
| Amateur Extra | 125 | 21% | 21% |
| Advanced | 21 | 4% | 3% |
| Novice / Other | 9 | 2% | 2% |
Bar = Matanuska-Susitna Borough share · Tick = Alaska share
In the past 12 months, 4 operators upgraded to General and 3 to Amateur Extra.
How Matanuska-Susitna Borough compares
#3 of 30 Alaska boroughs and census areas for new hams in the past 12 months
| Per 1,000 active hams | Matanuska-Susitna | Alaska | U.S. |
|---|---|---|---|
| New hams, past 12 months | 20.1 | 36.8 | 32.3 |
| Upgrades, past 12 months | 11.7 | 16.2 | 14.7 |
| Expiring, next 6 months | 52.0 | 65.5 | 57.3 |
12 new hams in Matanuska-Susitna Borough this past year. Get next month’s list free.
Sign Up Free →Put these numbers to work
Nearby counties
Share Matanuska-Susitna Borough’s numbers
Select the text to copy it.
Figures may be reused with credit to Ham Recruiter (CC BY 4.0).
Questions about new hams in Matanuska-Susitna Borough
How many new ham radio operators were licensed in Matanuska-Susitna Borough last year?
12 people in Matanuska-Susitna Borough, Alaska received their first FCC amateur radio license in the 12 months ending Oct 1, 2026, compared with 8 the year before.
How many licensed ham radio operators are in Matanuska-Susitna Borough?
596 active amateur licensees: 45% Technician, 29% General, 21% Amateur Extra.
Where does this data come from?
From the FCC Universal Licensing System (ULS) public amateur license database, which we download every Monday. Addresses are matched to counties with the U.S. Census Bureau geocoder. This page shows totals only.
How can my club reach new hams in Matanuska-Susitna Borough?
Create a free Ham Recruiter account and save a 5 to 25 mile search around your club. On the 1st of every month we email you a CSV of new hams, upgrades and other changes in and around Matanuska-Susitna Borough. Sign up free.
Can I see the names or call signs on this page?
No. Public pages show totals only. Verified Ham Recruiter users can search and export lists for outreach; see how licensee information is handled.
About this data
Data as of . Source: FCC Universal Licensing System (ULS) weekly amateur license database; county from U.S. Census Bureau geocoding. Aggregates only, no individual licensee data is shown. Aggregate figures © Ham Recruiter, CC BY 4.0.
How we count
- New ham: an active licensee whose first license was granted in the period.
- Address updates: a change of FCC mailing address, often a move into the area.
- Counts use each licensee’s current FCC address. Someone licensed here who later moved is counted where they live now.
- Each license keeps only its most recent event of each type, so two upgrades in one year count once.
- PO-box-only addresses often can’t be matched to a county, so rural counties are slightly undercounted.